Fig.#13. If we accept that each level of the diagram denotes a respective level into the future (see Fig. #12), then let us assume that the top level begins with the choice of which dimension to descend into; furthermore, let us also assume that there are as many dimensions as there are elements in creation (both, presently known elements and presently unknown elements), and that each level of creation is governed by its own relative time, as seen in panel two, above.

Again, assume the same pattern for all the lower levels into the future. The choice becomes, which Universe to descend into (there is one Universe for every element), which Galaxy of that specific Universe to descend into, assuming that the chosen Galaxy has Star-Systems that have planets that can support life as we know life to be in all its forms, both presently known and unknown).

Notice how a lower level's needs can modify or place limits upon a higher level's choice--if a Dimension does not have a Universe that does not have a Galaxy that does not have Star Systems that does not have Solar Systems that does not have planets that can support life (the form which that life takes need not be in the specific form of life that we of Earth accept life to be to satisfy the need for life; in that, it need not be based on Carbon; it can be based upon any element native to the level in question), then it cannot be chosen as a link into man's future Timeline.

Once we have reached the level of Planets, the choices become even more complicated. There are many forms of life upon Planet Earth [as there would be upon the other planets of choice], and each form of life that lives has its own set of needs that is specific to its environmental limits... will it be mammal and live on land? or will it be mammal and live in water? will it be mammal and walk on all fours? will it be mammal and walk upright? or, will it be mammal at all? what level of the food chain will it reside on? will it be of the Plant Kingdom? which Kingdom will it be a part of? where in the kingdom's food chain will he reside? ... as we can see, this set of conditions is really quite complicated.

Still, once we have chosen the planet's needs, we now have to deal with the set of conditions that deal with the individual life's form... will it be aware of itself as being an individual of a species? or will it simply be aware of its immediate needs only? will it have the awareness of more than itself? will it have awareness of having/living upon more than one level simultaneously? or, will it not know of the possibility of an afterlife? even if it is not aware of its BaKa, nor its Ba, how much communication will exist between its Ka and its higher-selves?

The next set of conditions is even more complicated than all that has come before it, all put together--it is the specific set of conditions that deal with the chosen illusion. Needless to say, the chosen illusion is modified by and limited by the specific form that the life will take during its incarnation into the planet in question. Among the many possible choices are: will they be Male? or will they be Female, or, will they be Bisexual? or will they be Neuter? ... still, will they give birth to live babies? or, will they give birth to eggs? ... still, will the sexes be stable? or, will the form change their sex during the same life's cycle?

Again, the next set of conditions is still more complicated than the last set--this set deals with the Games level of creation--there are so many possible choices in this set that it is impossible to state them all. Among the many possibilities are: will the life be aware of Country? or, will it not align itself to anything but itself/its mate? ... will it have the concept of Family? or, will it simply be a loner, changing its family as the needs of the season's mating change?

It is important to notice how the set of conditions become more and more complicated as the life-form makes its choices with respect to its Timeline into the future. We are now at that level that chooses the many different games that must be played (according to law, it matters not which game that is chosen, it only matters that a game is chosen; and, karmically, it matters not if the game is as holy as the game of Doctor-to-the-poor, or if the game is as evil as Murder. All that matters is that a game must be chosen. Without games, no life-form may descend into an illusion). The possibilities are nearly unlimited... will they play the game of Male? or will they play the game of Female? or, maybe they will play the game of both at different times of their lives? Karmically, will they be a male trapped into a female's body? or a female trapped into a male's body? will they act the part in the body they were born in? or will they go through a sex change operation before they finally succumb to acting their respective parts? ... still, will they play the game of importance, such as top-dog? will they play the game of power and seek to become leader, of sorts--President, Governor, member of government? ... maybe their games will be more peaceful--farmer, teacher, doctor, nurse, patient, health-care giver? ... how about trapping games? will they be enablers, rescuers? ... still, there are the self-sacrifice games; such as, being-on-the-cross, victim, martyr?

Upon descending still another layer into Maya, we come upon the level wherein we find the roles that will be played. Indeed, there are many from which to choose. Will we choose to be Fathers? or will fate make us choose the role of Father because of thoughtless actions? will we choose to be Mothers? or, will situations make the choice for us? maybe we will be forced to play both roles to a child of passion, just out of divorce court? ... still, will we play the role of employer or employee? If we play the role of employee, will we be wife? mistress? store clerk? driver? teacher? or, as either mother/father will we be forced to play them all to our children of passion? The sets of conditions do, indeed, become complicated, do they not?

The next sets are far too complex to deal with individually. Let it be sufficient to say that each is a complete continuum unto itself, a continuum that must interact with the collective whole of all the choices that have been made to date. The continuums are:

• the individual's personality factors, and the prospect of the introduction of positive change;
• the individual's emotional stability, and all the damage that the lack of emotional stability will have upon the individual's environment, and upon all the other individuals that the unstable emotions will come in contact with;
• the individual's social needs, specifically, will they truly need people to feel a sense of self-worth? or, will they allow the rest of society to go about its own way, taking what that society has to offer without being limited in their growth?
• the individual's personal belief-system and the limitations which that belief-system imposes upon the individual's life; and, the hardship which that belief-system imposes upon the individual's environment; and, let us not forget the hardship which that belief-system imposes upon others as they interact on the many levels of contact;
• the many continuum's necessities as those necessities impact upon life, in general, as the individual acts and reacts to those around them;
• the many limitations' necessities, as those necessities impact upon life, in general, as the individual acts and reacts to those around them, and as the necessities of the social order impacts upon the individual's life-style;
• the karmic bondings [the with-bonds, the for-bonds, and the against-bonds] that the individual must deal with during any given cycle of life, and the many unexpected relationships which those karmic bonds impose upon the individual, the society, the environment, and the "others" that must share the planet;
• the level of awareness that the individual is governed by, and the seeming extra hardship that is encountered because of the lack of ability to recognize the need for change;
• the level of understanding that the individual is governed by, and the seeming extra hardship that is encountered because of the lack of understanding which prevents the ability to recognize the cause & effect relationship that is the source of much pain, therefore, the true source of the life's need for change;
• the level of peace, and/or the degree to which the life sees the world with a point of view that is not conducive to a calm nature, thus causing a constant state of war between the individual and others of his kind, between the individual and his environment, between the individual and his needs, and between the individual and himself;
• the ease with which the individual can make changes, regardless of the level of the changes, and, regardless of the need for the changes; to the degree that the individual is set in his ways, to that degree will the individual oppose changes; to that degree will there be trouble when dealing with others, with his environment, and with himself;
• the basic stability, as opposed to the excessive stubbornness which prevents necessary change, and the impact which that stubbornness has upon all concerned;
• the level of self acceptance, and the hardship that is brought about by refusing to accept the self as worthy, independent of the relationship the individual has with others, and/or with the environment;
• the level of the life's need for others, and the unnecessary hardship that is caused when the individual cannot spend quality alone time without feeling lonely;
• the level at which the individual can accept the need for change within self as opposed to the recognition of the need for change--specifically, if the individual recognizes the need for change within self but refuses to accept that change, there is unnecessary hardship in the relationship between the individual and "those who love" to interact with the individual in question.